Human Law Vs Divine Law - consider, that
Plato ? An Athenian citizen of high status, he displays in his works his absorption in the political events and intellectual movements of his time, but the questions he raises are so profound and the strategies he uses for tackling them so richly suggestive and provocative that educated readers of nearly every period have in some way been influenced by him, and in practically every age there have been philosophers who count themselves Platonists in some important respects. But he was so self-conscious about how philosophy should be conceived, and what its scope and ambitions properly are, and he so transformed the intellectual currents with which he grappled, that the subject of philosophy, as it is often conceived—a rigorous and systematic examination of ethical, political, metaphysical, and epistemological issues, armed with a distinctive method—can be called his invention. Few other authors in the history of Western philosophy approximate him in depth and range: perhaps only Aristotle who studied with him , Aquinas, and Kant would be generally agreed to be of the same rank. Among the most important of these abstract objects as they are now called, because they are not located in space or time are goodness, beauty, equality, bigness, likeness, unity, being, sameness, difference, change, and changelessness. Nearly every major work of Plato is, in some way, devoted to or dependent on this distinction. Many of them explore the ethical and practical consequences of conceiving of reality in this bifurcated way. We are urged to transform our values by taking to heart the greater reality of the forms and the defectiveness of the corporeal world. We must recognize that the soul is a different sort of object from the body—so much so that it does not depend on the existence of the body for its functioning, and can in fact grasp the nature of the forms far more easily when it is not encumbered by its attachment to anything corporeal. In a few of Plato's works, we are told that the soul always retains the ability to recollect what it once grasped of the forms, when it was disembodied prior to its possessor's birth see especially Meno , and that the lives we lead are to some extent a punishment or reward for choices we made in a previous existence see especially the final pages of Republic.Human Law Vs Divine Law Video
What are the Four Kinds of Law, according to St. Thomas Aquinas Human Law Vs Divine Law
Civil Vs Divine Law tiggynation T Question: You indicated in one of your answers regarding getting drunk that breaking a civil law is by definition a sin.
Thus, breaking a civil law does not necessarily mean sin. Answer: You are correct that Aquinas and Catholic teaching and tradition requires us to observe revealed divine law the Ten Commandments and natural law before in a hierarchical sense human positive law civil law.
The Value of Human Life
For example, the law which decriminalized abortion in the United States denies equal protection under the laws to citizens and potential citizens of the nation. Moreover, it encourages murder. Therefore, that law is not a true law and need not be observed by Christians.
In other words, we do not have to hold that abortion is okay, legal, acceptable, a right, or any other thing. However, all the other laws, regarding trespassing, murder, destruction of property, which are legitimate laws and are necessary to the common good must be observed.
Indeed, violating a just civil or criminal law is an immoral act. For it is observation of the civil laws which allows society to function. Very Rev.]
One thought on “Human Law Vs Divine Law”