The Decline Of Rural America Video
Are America's Small Towns Really Struggling? The Decline Of Rural America
Declinr midterm elections affirmed that the deep geographic divides within the United States are here to stay. As they did inAmericans living in rural areas overwhelmingly backed Republican candidates, fueled in part by the sense that the American economy is leaving them behind. The plight of rural America, and ideas for its economic revival, continues to animate policy discussions, including among Democrats concerned about their ability The Decline Of Rural America appeal to blue-collar voters.
But it would be a mistake to enact policy solutions to save rural America at the expense of cities. Recent efforts to bail out farmers amidst a trade war and exempt rural counties from work requirements to receive Medicaid and other safety-net services in effect hurt people and businesses in cities and suburbs. URral these policy moves seem like clever ways to rebalance urban-rural economic divides, they could ultimately harm rural communities, too, by choking off the very engines that make rural investments possible.
In fact, one of the best ways to help rural America may involve helping cities: supporting a distributed network of economically vibrant small and mid-sized cities across the United States. When looking into urban and rural communities, some context is useful to consider. Many residents in this country, and across the world, continue to move to The Decline Of Rural America to pursue better lives. Though the fastest rates of urban growth are taking place outside of the United StatesAmerica continues to become a more urban nation: Sincemetropolitan areas in the United States grew in population by more than 6 percentwhile non-metropolitan areas shrank by 0.
To be sure, rural areas have experienced an uptick in employment inand within the longer-term trend of rural decline are countless stories of smaller localities that found ways to maintain, and growtheir populations and economies. But the fundamental reality is that more people will live in cities in the years ahead, regardless of any local, state, or federal policy initiative. This pattern holds for state government DDecline, too.
Roundup: February 22, 2021
Studies in MinnesotaGeorgia, and Wisconsin reveal that metropolitan areas contribute more to source coffers than they receive in education, infrastructure, and other public services investments.
In Georgia, for instance, metropolitan Atlanta provides 61 percent of state revenue but receives just 46 percent of state investment. State spending on roads, broadband networks, schools, The Decline Of Rural America other public services in small town America is funded, in part, by the economic prosperity of cities. Just 40 percent of residents in these more proximate communities said that they would advise young people to leave for opportunity elsewhere, compared with 61 percent of residents who lived in towns that were farther from cities.
Related Content
Proximity to cities itself might not be as important as a related attribute: access. In other words, the communities that were The Decline Of Rural America closely connected to larger markets did better. Yet these studies reinforce a simple premise. While city and rural economies retain important, mutually reinforcing linkages, recent trends suggest that the clustering of peoplejobs, and capital —known as economic agglomeration—will see more to accelerate into the 21st century.
Despite promising employment growth over the past several years, the fact remains that low-density rural areas represent the opposite of what matters in an economy that rewards concentration of knowledge assets. Rural communities still have lower shares of residents with college degrees, digital skills, and specialized, knowledge-based jobs, all of which are crucial determinants of durable success in the modern era.
Sign up for our newsletter
Some economists suggest that the United States needs fewer, larger cities. They observe that compared to other developed countries that have just one or two dominant cities such as London in the United Kingdom, or Sydney and Melbourne in Australiagrowth in the U. Moreover, larger cities tend to have more productive economies, owing to the benefits of agglomeration.
These economists conclude that, because the national economy would grow fastest if more people moved from low-productivity to high-productivity places, public efforts should focus on removing barriers to geographic mobility. Policies The Decline Of Rural America make it easier for more people to move to our biggest cities are worth pursuing. But it is not go here nor realistic to expect most low-income The Decline Of Rural America to leave their social networks or afford high-cost areas. A more strategic approach would aim to accelerate economic growth across mid-sized metro areas and micropolitan areas that are accessible to nearby rural areas. Imagine the state of Illinois not just anchored by the Chicago metro area, but by a network of other vibrant communities like Rockford, Peoria, Decatur, and Champaign-Urbana, which in turn offer opportunities for surrounding rural communities.
Micropolitan areas like Traverse City, Mich.]
Bravo, remarkable phrase and is duly
You are absolutely right. In it something is also thought good, agree with you.